ffc team mailing list archive

[Johan Jansson <jjan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:50:17AM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> I used the set module before but recently switched to the built-in
> set for no particular reason. I just thought since 2.5 is out, I didn't
> need to keep compatibility with Python 2.3, especially since I wasn't
> sure I was compatible with Python 2.3 elsewhere.
> 
> Do you need FFC to work with Python 2.3?
> 
> /Anders
> 

Ok, if it's an easy fix I think it would be good to keep Python 2.3
compatibility for 6-12 months more. The latest Red Hat Enterprise
Linux (which we use at KTH, RHEL 4) doesn't include Python 2.4 yet,
and neither does Max OS X as far as I can see.

  Johan