ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:27:37PM +0100, Johan Jansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:50:17AM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> > I used the set module before but recently switched to the built-in
> > set for no particular reason. I just thought since 2.5 is out, I didn't
> > need to keep compatibility with Python 2.3, especially since I wasn't
> > sure I was compatible with Python 2.3 elsewhere.
> > 
> > Do you need FFC to work with Python 2.3?
> > 
> > /Anders
> > 
> 
> Ok, if it's an easy fix I think it would be good to keep Python 2.3
> compatibility for 6-12 months more. The latest Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux (which we use at KTH, RHEL 4) doesn't include Python 2.4 yet,
> and neither does Max OS X as far as I can see.
> 
>   Johan

Sounds strange since even 2.5 has been out for a while, but I'll try
to use the set module.

/Anders