ffc team mailing list archive

[Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Sorry, didn't look at the generated code. FFC is generating quadrature
> code, I thought the default argument quadrature_points=False to jit
> options meant tensor representation. How do I choose tensor
> representation with jit?

I thought FFC was using tensor representation by default? The quadrature_points
option can be used to specify how many quadrature points are used if one
compiles using the quadrature representation.

Kristian
 
> -- 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 2007/10/16, Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > 2007/10/16, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > > > In the FFC manual it says that --optimize is currently ignored, does
> > > > this mean that optimization isn't working at all at the moment?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It means that FErari isn't being used.
> >
> > When will it be reimplemented then?
> >
> > > > We're doing benchmarks of sfc vs ffc vs dealII vs diffpack, and ffc
> > > > isn't doing as well as I expected.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Are you looking at just assembly?
> > >
> > > Garth
> >
> > Just computing the element tensor. (We'll do full assembly too later.)
> >
> > --
> > Martin
> >
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>