ffc team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> Quoting Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Sorry, didn't look at the generated code. FFC is generating quadrature
> > code, I thought the default argument quadrature_points=False to jit
> > options meant tensor representation. How do I choose tensor
> > representation with jit?
>
> I thought FFC was using tensor representation by default? The quadrature_points
> option can be used to specify how many quadrature points are used if one
> compiles using the quadrature representation.

Anders might have set quadrature as default for JIT as it compiles 
faster than the quadrature representation.

Garth


> Kristian
>  
> > --
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > 2007/10/16, Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > 2007/10/16, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > > > > In the FFC manual it says that --optimize is currently ignored, does
> > > > > this mean that optimization isn't working at all at the moment?
> > > > It means that FErari isn't being used.
> > > When will it be reimplemented then?
> > >
> > > > > We're doing benchmarks of sfc vs ffc vs dealII vs diffpack, and ffc
> > > > > isn't doing as well as I expected.
> > > > Are you looking at just assembly?
> > > >
> > > > Garth
> > > Just computing the element tensor. (We'll do full assembly too later.)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin
> > _______________________________________________
> > FFC-dev mailing list
> > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev