ffc team mailing list archive

[Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting FFC <ffc@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary ffc repository.
> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> 
> changeset:   1328:83a16cff359ac9faf01d3af927e8d88a6005663e
> tag:         tip
> user:        "Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> date:        Tue Feb 24 15:33:18 2009 +0100
> files:       ffc/common/constants.py ffc/jit/jit.py ffc/jit/jitobject.py
> test/verify_tensors/test.py
> description:
> Added option 'compiler' to FFC_OPTIONS, default is ffc. The JIT compiler uses
> this to determine if the standard FFC compiler or the UFL compiler should be
> used.

I ran all tests in DOLFIN and nothing seems to be broken. I fixed this by
calling jit_object.signature() (to generate jit_object.form_data) BEFORE
checking cache. If this is somehow unsafe, we need to come up with a different
approach. I just think that it will introduce a small overhead?

Kristian

> 
> changeset:   1327:4290605594500e5fbe61f7c57b0be4bf1c7f171b
> user:        "Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> date:        Tue Feb 24 11:30:14 2009 +0100
> files:       ffc/compiler/codegeneration/quadrature/__init__.py
> ffc/compiler/codegeneration/quadrature/uflquadraturegenerator.py
> ffc/compiler/codegeneration/quadrature/uflquadraturegenerator_utils.py
> ffc/compiler/representation/quadrature/uflquadraturerepresentation.py
> ffc/compiler/uflcompiler.py
> description:
> UFL quadrature representation seems to work for quite a few forms (cell
> integrals). Needs testing.
> 
> 
> changeset:   1326:4929bd79f67f32b1b9abf9dbfd96c122d01d67f0
> user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Fri Feb 20 10:26:30 2009 +0100
> files:       ffc/compiler/uflcompiler.py
> description:
> Testing monomial extraction in uflcompiler.py
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more details, visit http://www.fenics.org/hg/ffc
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>