ffc team mailing list archive

[Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:52:06PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:39:31PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > > > Quoting buildbot@xxxxxxxxxx:
> > > >
> > > > > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux-64 on FEniCS
> > > Buildbot.
> > > > > Full details are available at:
> > > > >  http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux-64/builds/3
> > > > >
> > > > > Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/
> > > > >
> > > > > Buildslave for this Build: linux-64
> > > > >
> > > > > Build Reason:
> > > > > Build Source Stamp: HEAD
> > > > > Blamelist: k.b.oelgaard
> > > > >
> > > > > BUILD FAILED: failed ffc check
> > > >
> > > > I don't get this error. It complains about the JIT compiler not being
> fast
> > > > enough, but it is OK on my computer.
> > > >
> > > > JIT in-memory cache: 9.08374786377e-05
> > > > JIT disk cache:      0.116662979126
> > > > Reasonable values are 0.002 and 0.03
> > >
> > > Something seems to have happened with the disk cache. You get 0.1
> > > seconds. I have
> > >
> > >   JIT in-memory cache: 9.70363616943e-05
> > >   JIT disk cache:      0.0144801139832
> >
> > Yes, I get similar numbers on my machine. The numbers I reported above is
> from
> > the buildbot.
>
> ok, so the disk cache/signature computation may be slow on the build
> bot. Perhaps we should increase the limit to 0.5s?

Done.

Kristian

> --
> Anders
>
>
> > > The disk cache involves computing the signature. Has something change
> > > wrt computing signatures?
> >
> > Not as far as I know.
> >
> > Kristian
> >
> > >
> > > > F..
> > > > ======================================================================
> > > > FAIL: Test that JIT compiler is fast enough.
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > >   File "test.py", line 254, in testPoisson
> > > >     self.assertTrue(dt1 < 0.1) ## Is this threshold too strict??
> > > > AssertionError
> > > >
> > > > Kristian
> > > >
> > > > > sincerely,
> > > > >  -The Buildbot
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > FFC-dev mailing list
> > > > > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > FFC-dev mailing list
> > > > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FFC-dev mailing list
> > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>