ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > I tried to use the new UFL function estimate_max_polynomial_degree
> > but the results seem to be incorrect for quadrature representation.
> > (Or the references are wrong which I doubt.)
> >
> > Kristian, can you take a look at this?
> >
> > Try running the test in simple_verify_tensors. It reports the
> > following errors:
> >
> > FunctionOperatorsBilinearForm_cell_integral_0:      *** (diff = 0.010098)
> > MassBilinearForm_cell_integral_0:                   *** (diff = 1e-09)
> > NeumannProblemLinearForm_cell_integral_0:           *** (diff = 0.0029685)
> > NeumannProblemLinearForm_exterior_facet_integral_0: *** (diff = 0.00292)
> > OptimizationBilinearForm_cell_integral_0:           *** (diff = 2.19169)
> > PoissonDGBilinearForm_interior_facet_integral_0:    *** (diff = 0.3504)
> > PoissonSystemLinearForm_cell_integral_0:            *** (diff = 0.0029685)
> > QuadratureElementBilinearForm_cell_integral_0:      *** (diff = 0.249892)
> > QuadratureElementLinearForm_cell_integral_0:        *** (diff = 0.10106)
> > StokesLinearForm_cell_integral_0:                   *** (diff = 0.00140453)
> 
> This should be fixed now such that we only get the expected differences.
> 
> Kristian

Garth, can you check that the example you had works now?

Then we can go ahead and remove the old stuff.

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature