ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02438
Re: [HG FFC] Use new UFL function estimate_max_polynomial_degree to estimate quadrature
Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > I tried to use the new UFL function estimate_max_polynomial_degree
> > > but the results seem to be incorrect for quadrature representation.
> > > (Or the references are wrong which I doubt.)
> > >
> > > Kristian, can you take a look at this?
> > >
> > > Try running the test in simple_verify_tensors. It reports the
> > > following errors:
> > >
> > > FunctionOperatorsBilinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff = 0.010098)
> > > MassBilinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff = 1e-09)
> > > NeumannProblemLinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff =
> 0.0029685)
> > > NeumannProblemLinearForm_exterior_facet_integral_0: *** (diff = 0.00292)
> > > OptimizationBilinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff = 2.19169)
> > > PoissonDGBilinearForm_interior_facet_integral_0: *** (diff = 0.3504)
> > > PoissonSystemLinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff =
> 0.0029685)
> > > QuadratureElementBilinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff = 0.249892)
> > > QuadratureElementLinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff = 0.10106)
> > > StokesLinearForm_cell_integral_0: *** (diff =
> 0.00140453)
> >
> > This should be fixed now such that we only get the expected differences.
> >
> > Kristian
>
> Garth, can you check that the example you had works now?
>
> Then we can go ahead and remove the old stuff.
Once this has been confirmed and *.form removed, we should generate new
references using the *.ufl forms such that the last differences disappear.
Kristian
> --
> Anders
>
Follow ups
References