ffc team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kent Andre wrote:
> > Not sure what we have to do actually. I suppose I want get any clue from the 
> >
> >   demo/function/restriction
> >
> > demo? 
> >
> > I see that Kent has modified the dolfin.FunctionSpace to reflect the present 
> > (broken) implementation of restriction, anything in that line? Should such an 
> > implementation has been done in FunctionSpaceBase instead of FunctionSpace? 
> > Kent?
> >
> > Johan
>
> This restriction is different in the sense that the restriction is made
> by the standard element on a sub mesh. 
>
> The restriction in focus now is on the complete mesh but for only
> a part of the element. 
>
> Combined, these two features will be very powerful.  I guess the 
> sub-mesh restriction stuff is broken due to the parallel mesh. 

Yes, we had to clean-up the DofMap in particular to make progress with 
parallel assembly which means that sub-mesh restriction is broken at the 
moment.

Garth

> Kent
>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev