ffc team mailing list archive

[Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > Quoting Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> >> (Tested both using tensor and quadrature representation.
> >> Tensor and quad differ somewhat for the norm(u).
> >> Is the quadrature default to integrate RTs using
> >> "too low" a quadrature rule still?)
> >>
> >
> > Could be, quadrature uses the UFL guesstimate which just looks at the
> element
> > degree. And I think it is 'tricked' by the RT element when doing this (as I
> > recall it). You can set the quadrature order through metadata of the
> Measure to
> > increase the order manually, then tensor and quadrature should at least
> agree.
> > Do note that tensor representation ignores the metadata input (which is a
> bug).
> >
>
> Maybe life would be simpler if we just changed the numbering of the RT
> and the Nedelecs?
> So that a finite element space of degree k is always in P_k?

Yes I think so, because UFL is unaware (and is designed to be) of finite
elements and their definition/implementation.

Kristian

> --
> Marie
>