ffc team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/main] Rev 1332: Add new operators for the symbolics classes and rearrange unit tests for maintainability.

To: Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:08:46 +0100
Cc: FFC Mailing List <ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <g46qus1pibcoosqacxUYAxe124vaj_firegpg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:07:37AM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>
> 2010/1/7 Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >I haven't looked very closely at the symbolic stuff before, but it
> >seems a bit strange to have so much symbolic classes in FFC when we
> >have UFL as a symbolic backend.
>
> It is not really related to what UFL does. It is a lightweight SymPy which uses whatever format FFC uses for creating code. For these reasons it doesn't really fit within the scope of UFL which is input language only.
>
> Kristian

ok. I might have some more comments on it once I get into how the
quadrature code generation works.

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References

Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/main] Rev 1332: Add new operators for the symbolics classes and rearrange unit tests for maintainability.
From: Anders Logg, 2010-01-07
Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/main] Rev 1332: Add new operators for the symbolics classes and rearrange unit tests for maintainability.
From: Kristian Oelgaard, 2010-01-08