ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03381
Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/dev] Rev 1502: Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be
On 21/01/2010 15:46, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Harish Narayanan wrote:
>> On 21/01/2010 14:19, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/1/21 <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> revno: 1502
>>>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> branch nick: ffc-unstable
>>>> timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 15:13:40 +0100
>>>> message:
>>>> Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be
>>>> (j, i) instead of (i, j).
>>>>
>>> Cool, I guess this means that the indices is based on some theory after
>>> all :)
>>>
>>
>> Would the reason why the covariant Piola map doesn't contain a det(J)
>> but the contravariant Piola does be clarified on reading
>> RognesKirbyEtAl2009?
>>
>
> Yes.
Excellent. I am curious to find out.
Harish
References