← Back to team overview

ffc team mailing list archive

Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/dev] Rev 1502: Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be

 

On 21/01/2010 15:46, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Harish Narayanan wrote:
>> On 21/01/2010 14:19, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>>  
>>> 2010/1/21  <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>    
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> revno: 1502
>>>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> branch nick: ffc-unstable
>>>> timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 15:13:40 +0100
>>>> message:
>>>>  Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be
>>>>  (j, i) instead of (i, j).
>>>>       
>>> Cool, I guess this means that the indices is based on some theory after
>>> all :)
>>>     
>>
>> Would the reason why the covariant Piola map doesn't contain a det(J)
>> but the contravariant Piola does be clarified on reading
>> RognesKirbyEtAl2009?
>>   
> 
> Yes.

Excellent. I am curious to find out.

Harish



References