Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 28 January 2010 22:12, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kristian Oelgaard wrote:On 28 January 2010 21:16, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Anders Logg wrote:On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 07:51:52PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:On 28 January 2010 19:18, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Update: ElementRestriction.uflCould you have a look at and comment on the discussion about element restrictions? It was posted a couple of days ago on the list. It would be nice to get right the first time. KristianI can't find the discussion about element restrictions. What is the status of getting ElementRestriction working? I haven't looked at restrictions at all so I don't know how it should be handled. And shouldn't the name of the element be RestrictedElement rather than ElementRestriction?I should probably be 'FacetRestriction'.No, because we can restrict elements to Cell, Measure and possibly SubDomain.'Can' or 'would like to'? ;)
OK, so it is 'could' in the old FFC for restrictions onto facets and to Measure (the *dc that Mehdi uses), the sub-domains business is easy to switch on i UFL, but harder to implement in FFC and it is currently unsupported in both old and new FFC. And it wouldn't like to be able to restrict elements to SubDomains and the moment :) Kristian
GarthKristianGarth------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |