ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:42:23AM +0100, Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:30 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> > I tried looking at this but I'm unsure how it should be
> > handled. Should a cell_integral class be generated or should a
> > surface_integral class be generated?
> >
>
> We handle terms related to surface integral inside a class derived from
> ufc::cell_integral. I have started working on updating ffcpum module
> which is built against standard ffc.
>
> Mehdi

So a surface integral should just result in a standard cell integral
being generated? Then what is the point of having *dc? When the code
has been generated, you won't be able to tell which cell integrals
came from *dx and which came from *dc.

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature