← Back to team overview

ffc team mailing list archive

Re: [Ufl] [Bug 769811] [NEW] JIT cache problem with id(form)

 

>
> > On 25/04/11 20:00, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > Martin:
> > > Why is it important to have the _count in the repr of the form? I guess
> that
>

(Not sure if I got the quote author correct here.)

The ufl Form does not have a _count...

The _count of e.g. Coefficient objects is a critical property, since a(u, v)
!= a(v, u).


My hunch is that this is yet another PyDOLFIN/UFL integration issue?

As a general comment, the instant cache is for the generated modules,
not runtime state of the module calling upon instant. I think the caches
in instant should only represent the ufl->ffc->ufc "mapping", not including
dolfin and ffc state.

I can't comment further on this thread without understanding what the
problem is.

Martin

Follow ups

References