ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04138
Re: [Ufl] [Bug 769811] [NEW] JIT cache problem with id(form)
On Tuesday April 26 2011 00:01:04 Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > > On 25/04/11 20:00, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > Martin:
> > > > Why is it important to have the _count in the repr of the form? I
> > > > guess
> >
> > that
>
> (Not sure if I got the quote author correct here.)
>
> The ufl Form does not have a _count...
>
> The _count of e.g. Coefficient objects is a critical property, since a(u,
> v) != a(v, u).
>
Do not bother. It was a try for me to get into the original problem.
> My hunch is that this is yet another PyDOLFIN/UFL integration issue?
Yes.
> As a general comment, the instant cache is for the generated modules,
> not runtime state of the module calling upon instant. I think the caches
> in instant should only represent the ufl->ffc->ufc "mapping", not including
> dolfin and ffc state.
Agree.
Johan
> I can't comment further on this thread without understanding what the
> problem is.
>
> Martin
References