ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04180
Re: FFC uses wrong version of SWIG
This is fixed now, but we need to regenerate the references.
I spent 10 minutes trying to figure outhow to do that. I was not able to
figure it out. Could someone(TM) please add a howto, preferably in a README
file in the test/regression folder?
Johan
On Thursday May 5 2011 03:22:14 Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Martin made me aware of the following error on the buildbot:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/ffc/test/unit/misc/test.py",
> line 275, in testPoisson
> jit(a0, options)
> File
> "/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ffc/jitc
> ompiler.py", line 59, in jit
> return jit_form(object, parameters, common_cell)
> File
> "/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ffc/jitc
> ompiler.py", line 119, in jit_form
> cache_dir = cache_dir)
> File
> "/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ufc_util
> s/build.py", line 60, in build_ufc_module
> (cpp_path, swig_include_dirs) = configure_instant(swig_binary,
> swig_path) File
> "/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ufc_util
> s/build.py", line 105, in configure_instant
> """ % ufc.__swigversion__
> OSError: The python extension module of UFC was not compiled with the
> present version of swig.
> Install swig version 2.0.1 or recompiled UFC with present swig
>
> The problem seems to be that UFC was built with /usr/bin/swig2.0,
> while FFC tries to use /usr/bin/swig. I'm not sure if the bug is in
> UFC, Instant or FFC.
>
> Full log on buildbot:
>
> http://fenicsproject.org:8080/builders/ffc-lucid-amd64/builds/348/steps/ffc
> %20check/logs/stdio
>
> Johannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
> Post to : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References