fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00339
Re: Question about admin IP address allocation
My scenario occurs when eth0 and eth1 are connected to PXE network and a
PortFast feature is not enabled on a switch. Eth0 can get a timeout from
time to time and if the Cobbler will know a eth0 MAC only, it'll boot it to
the bootstrap.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Mosesohn <mmosesohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Andrey,
>
> This is something a user could always fix himself. Typically you do
> DHCP on eth0, then eth1,etc.... and the only case I can think of where
> your scenario would occur is if we were trying to provision 50+ nodes
> with an underpowered master. But what's more likely is eth0 will start
> PXE boot and fail to receive the whole image and reboot and try again.
> If you have systems PXE booting on eth0 for bootstrap then eth1 for
> provision, then it's a really odd machine and I think we need to
> discount that case.
>
> If this scenario is real and reproducable, we can definitely work
> around it and create system records in Cobbler (but not reserve an IP
> for them) that correspond to all the other MAC addresses of the
> system. We could forward them to a special profile that tells cobbler
> to update its records for DNS and the system profile, then reboot it
> and provision again. Or at minimum a warning state that we can use to
> give feedback to the user that PXE is not working correctly on a
> particular node.
>
> If a user wants to deploy 100 nodes with 6 NICs in each system, a /24
> should be enough, but with our non-optimal logic, it requires a /22
> network to deploy: 100 IPs for bootstrap and 600 IPs for provisioning.
>
> The solution in place doesn't work and doesn't meet expectations of
> real use cases. We should pick an approach that will make the most
> people happy.
>
> -Matthew
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Andrey Danin <adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The problem is the Cobbler will force the node to boot to bootstrap if he
> > doesn't recognize it via known MAC. Here are the boot process diagrams.
> > The right one:
> > # node's embedded PXE software starts a boot-up procedure via eht0
> > # Cobbler knows eth0 MAC and puts to the node a PXE config to download
> and
> > run an installation image (CentOS)
> > # The node goes to the provisioning state.
> >
> > The bad one:
> > # node runs PXE procedure over eth1
> > # Cobbler doesn't know eth1 MAC and sends to the node a PXE config
> with a
> > bootstrap image.
> > # the node boots into bootstrap and an installation process fails.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Matthew Mosesohn <
> mmosesohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrey,
> >>
> >> We can use the same tactic we use in Ubuntu to ensure that CentOS
> >> starts installing on the correct MAC by adding the kernel parameter
> >> ks.device=$MACADDR. It will try to DHCP on that interface and
> >> eliminate the possibility of having 2 or more NICs on the same subnet
> >> as the PXE server.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Andrey Danin <adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >> > There is a little chance that a node will boot up via another
> interface
> >> > and
> >> > Cobbler will put it to the bootstrap stage instead of the target
> stage.
> >> > We
> >> > have to provide all MAC addresses of a node to Cobbler but it can't
> use
> >> > one
> >> > IP for all MACs. So we have to allocate a lot of IPs.
> >> >
> >> > We can improve our mechanism by the following:
> >> > * Assign IP to the node's admin interface only. Use it as a default
> >> > behavior but add an UI switch to enable a greedy behavior.
> >> > * Run a predeployment DHCP check in order to find all interfaces
> which
> >> > really can communicate with PXE network and assign IPs to these
> >> > interfaces
> >> > only.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Ryan Moe <rmoe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> What is the reasoning behind assigning an IP from the admin network
> to
> >> >> all
> >> >> interfaces [1]? It has caused problems in deployments where IPs are
> >> >> tightly
> >> >> managed and/or machines have a large number of interfaces.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Ryan
> >> >>
> >> >> [1]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-web/blob/master/nailgun/nailgun/task/helpers.py#L435
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> >> >> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> >> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Andrey Danin
> >> > adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > skype: gcon.monolake
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> >> > Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrey Danin
> > adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > skype: gcon.monolake
>
--
Andrey Danin
adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: gcon.monolake
Follow ups
References