fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00390
Re: [feature status] Master node upgrade (python + puppet + lxc vs docker)
I'm not trying to go in that direction. I'm trying to build single
containers that run puppet... like a single class that runs classes
nailgun, nailgun::user, nailgun::venv, and nailgun::supervisor without
ostf, naily, postgres, etc for isolation.
Yes, we may end up using some puppet manifests to orchestrate upgrades
just because there are a few providers that can do this. Starting and
stopping containers involves running commands and grabbing the
generated IDs and a bash script may not be the most elegant method. We
should use a smart tool that is atomic and can fail where we need it
and provide useful feedback.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matt
>
> You can easily rewrite puppet modules by writing Puppet provider for Docker
> exec and applying puppet defaults class by class: e.g:
>
> Exec {provider=>Docker, ENV=>"export container_id=#{ID}"}
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobrelia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/10/2014 03:07 PM, Dmitry Ilyin wrote:
>> > Actually it's a very promising idea to move to atomic lxc container for
>> > our master node.
>> >
>> > Volumes used to run these containers could be packaged and easily
>> > installed or updated by just replacing the file by the new version.
>> > Container will also be compleatly independent and any changing would not
>> > break any neighbour container. (Well... except database structures...)
>> >
>> > Such containers will be able to speak to each other through unix or tcp
>> > sockets.
>> > Building such containers will require us to invent some automated system
>> > but their installation and use would be much more reliable then our
>> > current technology.
>> > This method can also combine configuration flexibility of
>> > puppet-deployed nodes with speed and reliability of image-based
>> > provisioned systems.
>> >
>> > We should also look into using the same approach for controller and even
>> > compute nodes. It could help us to find solution to our long lasting
>> > OpenStack upgrading problem.
>> AFIK, the main issue of Openstack upgrades is DB schema related (all
>> objects must have a versioning info, see
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/unified-object-model, for
>> example). I doubt docker could help here. Please correct me, If I'm wrong.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-02-10 Evgeniy L <eli@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:eli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> > As many of you may already know we started design/implementation of
>> > master node upgrade feature. Here you can read the design document
>> >
>> > <https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1Mem9LP7ysaHNNSltlCLPw36jHix5ULlKmsMgTViHfog/>.
>> >
>> >
>> > So, it's just status update of this feature.
>> >
>> > We want to use docker as containers management tool.
>> >
>> >
>> > *Here is Docker's pros and cons*
>> >
>> > Pros
>> >
>> > +
>> >
>> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17989306/what-does-docker-add-to-just-plain-lxc
>> >
>> > + rest API (it will be very useful in case of plugins, when we'll be
>> > able to setup new container from inside another container)
>> >
>> > + lxc requires us to design our own build process and networking
>> >
>> > + docker has a standard dockerfile format and tools to build images
>> > and store them in git and do version management
>> >
>> > Cons
>> >
>> > - additional complexity
>> >
>> > - non-persistent containers, it can be solved with volumes
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.tech-d.net/2013/12/16/persistent-volumes-with-docker-container-as-volume-pattern/
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.offermann.us/2013/12/tiny-docker-pieces-loosely-joined.html
>> >
>> > http://crosbymichael.com/advanced-docker-volumes.html
>> >
>> > - regarding non-persistent containers will be a lot of questions
>> > like "I patched nailgun but when I rerun container all changes are
>> > gone" (can be solved with documentation)
>> >
>> >
>> > Let us know if you have any ideas or questions.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > --
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> > Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > <mailto:fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan Dobrelya,
>> Skype #bogdando_at_yahoo.com
>> Irc #bogdando
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> Yours Faithfully,
> Vladimir Kuklin,
> Senior Deployment Engineer,
> Mirantis, Inc.
> +7 (495) 640-49-04
> +7 (926) 702-39-68
> Skype kuklinvv
> 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
> Moscow, Russia,
> www.mirantis.com
> www.mirantis.ru
> vkuklin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References