← Back to team overview

fuel-dev team mailing list archive

Re: Ubuntu HA failures on powerful servers

 

I've added "customer-found" tag to the bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1279211

Sergey - please make an effort to write a good bug description for it.
Right now it's hard to understand what the bug is about, and how it was
fixed.

Thanks,
Roman


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Sergey Vasilenko
<svasilenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Bogdan, that's not enough. We should check after each operation, thah this
> operation finished. Not only the mythical "ready" status.
>
> OSCI promise, that tomorrow we will have PCS package on ISO.
> I will rewrite part of resources for using this tool. It contains
> sync.modes for some operations.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
>
>> Thanks for acting on this quickly, Bogdan.
>>
>> So let's wait now while QA folks reproduce the issue, and then try to
>> apply a patch?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobrelia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/12/2014 11:45 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
>>> > On 02/12/2014 11:36 AM, Gleb Galkin wrote:
>>> >> On 12.02.2014 13:12, Mike Scherbakov wrote:
>>> >>> Fuelers,
>>> >>> that's the patch to 4.0/stable which I've got from
>>> >>> Gleb: http://paste.openstack.org/show/64570/
>>> >>> He did it together with Sergey to make the installation pass on
>>> Ubuntu
>>> >>> on powerful nodes. The issue is not reproducible on VMs.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Gleb, Sergey - do we have a bug report about this?
>>> >> Sure we have it here <https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1279211>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Nastya - I'm looking forward to see if it is reproducible on our
>>> >>> hardware lab.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Also, hacks with "sleep 15" are not something we want in master,
>>> >>> obviously... any ideas how it should be solved properly?
>>> >
>>> > Correct me please If I'm wrong, could it be related to the missed
>>> > self.class.block_until_ready call for cs_commit  provider?
>>> >
>>> > (just grep for block_until_ready in corosync module to clarify its
>>> > use cases)
>>>
>>> I believe, the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72911/ should fix it.
>>> Need to verify.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> >>> #mihgen
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Gleb Galkin
>>> >> OpenStack Deployment Engineer
>>> >>
>>> >> Mirantis Inc.
>>> >> www.mirantis.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bogdan Dobrelya,
>>> Skype #bogdando_at_yahoo.com
>>> Irc #bogdando
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

Follow ups

References