fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00434
Re: Ubuntu HA failures on powerful servers
Bogdan, error happens not in puppet layer.
The essence of happens is this:
we can commit change of CIB (with newly created resource) and request
status. Commit is async.
In returned status we can not found newly created resource just now.
But after cluster sync we found resource.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobrelia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 05:41 PM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote:
> > Bogdan, that's not enough. We should check after each operation, thah
> > this operation finished. Not only the mythical "ready" status.
>
> Standard exists? method for puppet provider should ensure that. It is
> also missed for commit & shadow.
>
> >
> > OSCI promise, that tomorrow we will have PCS package on ISO.
> > I will rewrite part of resources for using this tool. It contains
> > sync.modes for some operations.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Mike Scherbakov
> > <mscherbakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mscherbakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for acting on this quickly, Bogdan.
> >
> > So let's wait now while QA folks reproduce the issue, and then try
> > to apply a patch?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya
> > <bdobrelia@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bdobrelia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > On 02/12/2014 11:45 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> > > On 02/12/2014 11:36 AM, Gleb Galkin wrote:
> > >> On 12.02.2014 13:12, Mike Scherbakov wrote:
> > >>> Fuelers,
> > >>> that's the patch to 4.0/stable which I've got from
> > >>> Gleb: http://paste.openstack.org/show/64570/
> > >>> He did it together with Sergey to make the installation pass
> > on Ubuntu
> > >>> on powerful nodes. The issue is not reproducible on VMs.
> > >>>
> > >>> Gleb, Sergey - do we have a bug report about this?
> > >> Sure we have it here
> > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1279211>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Nastya - I'm looking forward to see if it is reproducible on
> our
> > >>> hardware lab.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, hacks with "sleep 15" are not something we want in
> master,
> > >>> obviously... any ideas how it should be solved properly?
> > >
> > > Correct me please If I'm wrong, could it be related to the
> missed
> > > self.class.block_until_ready call for cs_commit provider?
> > >
> > > (just grep for block_until_ready in corosync module to clarify
> its
> > > use cases)
> >
> > I believe, the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72911/ should
> > fix it.
> > Need to verify.
> >
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> --
> > >>> Mike Scherbakov
> > >>> #mihgen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Gleb Galkin
> > >> OpenStack Deployment Engineer
> > >>
> > >> Mirantis Inc.
> > >> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.com>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Bogdan Dobrelya,
> > Skype #bogdando_at_yahoo.com <http://bogdando_at_yahoo.com>
> > Irc #bogdando
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Scherbakov
> > #mihgen
> >
> > --
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> > Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bogdan Dobrelya,
> Skype #bogdando_at_yahoo.com
> Irc #bogdando
>
Follow ups
References