fuel-dev team mailing list archive

[Andrey Danin <adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What is the status of Pecan? Does it mature and used broadly in OpenStack
community? Or it's buggy like Oslo.messaging?


On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Nikolay Markov <nmarkov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello colleagues!
>
> As you may know, we really want to get rid of old web.py and go towards
> something new, especially because for now it's not really hard to rewrite
> our API as it became more abstract. Also, in Fuel 6.0 there will be
> multiple important changes in our API, so we definitely need to implement
> v2, and doing it using modern framework looks like a good start.
>
> I did some research on both Pecan and Flask, also we had a discussion on
> this subject with our Fuel-Python team yesterday, and looks like we're
> choosing Flask over Pecan, because there are almost no bad things anybody
> could say about it.
>
> What are your thoughts? I know there is a pull request on Pecan already,
> but my personal opinion is it doens't worth all this headache.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Nick Markov
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Andrey Danin
adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: gcon.monolake