graphite-dev team mailing list archive

[Cody Stevens <question170794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #170794 on Graphite changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/graphite/+question/170794

Cody Stevens posted a new comment:
It seems to me that both boxes are over what would be considered a
healthy capacity for their disk speeds.  After a few weeks of running I
see that the carbon graphs on the RAID 10 box seem much more stable than
the RAID 6 box, even though it is handling about 20k more metrics/min.
The graphs for the RAID 10 box seem to show a more steady pattern for
updates/commits and cache size where as the RAID 6 box looks more like a
graph you would pull off of a richter scale.  Also the cache size on
that one seems to oscillate a lot more and every once in a while climb
to the limit before coming back down to its regular oscillations.  The
RAID 10 box has never hit the cache size limit yet.  Also the updates
for the RAID 6 box are significantly lower.with short spikes.

Just posting more info to in case anybody else is interested.

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
graphite-dev, which is an answer contact for Graphite.