gtg-contributors team mailing list archive

["invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx" <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>]

I looked into doing a 0.25 release without liblarch over the winter
break, but it is too integrated with the rest. Rolling back to the
previous way of managing the task tree would require a lot of time.
So I moved to writing a small version of liblarch (since we no to want
it to be a backend for the gtk widget, we can drop most of the code)
separated from GTG. I'd love to finish it in time for Natty, but I'm
afraid I cannot assure that because of my daily work.
I'll try to show you a initial demo of my code later this month.

Luca


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Bryce Harrington <bryce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Heya Invernizzi, just to ressurrect this recent topic... how's the
> status on a possible 0.3 release for natty?
>
> Bryce
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:53:32PM -0800, invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I'll work on it this December, so I think it's highly likely to have one.
>> I'd like to know Lionel's opinion on when we may have a stable
>> liblarch, so that we can know if we have to backport bugfixes and
>> features to 0.2.5 or we can dare to aim at 0.3.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bryce Harrington <bryce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > gtg 0.2.4 was added in Ubuntu Lucid, and the same version shipped in
>> > Maverick.  0.2.4 is also the version present in Natty.  It's getting a
>> > bit long in the tooth. :-)
>> >
>> > It'd be nice for natty to do an update, even just a 0.2.5 with some
>> > bugfixes (and gtcli) rolled in...
>> >
>> > How likely is it that 0.3 could achieve a releasable status by natty
>> > feature freeze (Feb 24th)?
>> >
>> > Bryce
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors
>> > Post to     : gtg-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors
>> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >
>