gtg-contributors team mailing list archive

[Izidor Matušov <izidor.matusov@xxxxxxxxx>]

> I agree, but let's not make of this redesign project too much a big
> deal. I think we're better to follow an evolutionary path, by evolving
> iteratively the current codebase. I'm afraid that if we want to
> include too many changes in a "new GTG", the project will stall again.
> We already made that mistake, let's not do it again.

You're right. I propose to do that as a standalone change to GTG before 
integrating a new design into GTG. It would result in less work and a 
nicer implementation. There is ongoing GTG web initiative, they will 
need it soon too.

> So, in summary, I think we should consider a "client-daemon" as
> actually being independent of GTG redesign. It should figure on our
> roadmap, but not be a dependency of the UI redesign.

BTW: I've updated our Roadmap to the current state: 
https://live.gnome.org/gtg/Roadmap

Izidor