gtg-gsoc team mailing list archive
-
gtg-gsoc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00031
Re: dbus server
Great!
I don't think there will be problems with diverging because the only part of
gtg I'm changing for now is the dbus wrapper.
You can do it whenever you have time, it's not urgent; but the sooner the
better ;)
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Luca Invernizzi <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Karlo Jež <karlo.jez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [..]
> >
> > Well, now onto multiple users. :)
> > The most painless way I think it could be handled is to change the dbus
> api
> > to require a 'username' parameter.
> > Desktop GTG is started by the same user that uses it, so the interface
> would
> > send a real username (or leave it blank, I guess), and that would return
> all
> > the backends.
> > GTG online is started by one user, but others will use it. Web interface
> > would send a logged in user's name and the dbus server would return only
> the
> > backends pertaining to that user.
> >
> > What do you think?
> From the backends side, that would be easy to do. Tell me when you're
> going to venture in that part, because we might want to keep our
> branches not to diverge too much.
>
> Ciao!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-gsoc<https://launchpad.net/%7Egtg-gsoc>
> > Post to : gtg-gsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-gsoc<https://launchpad.net/%7Egtg-gsoc>
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
>
Follow ups
References