gtg-gsoc team mailing list archive

[Paul Natsuo Kishimoto <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 11:53 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> I haven't merged your branch at GUADEC because of the little point we
> were discussing. 
> 
> I'm deeply sorry about not being responsive but it has been a crazy
> week. At some point, also, we decided to write code before anything
> because we had to do it. But indeed, we missed a lot of your stuffs.

  That was my first guess — it's easier to work from familiar code,
instead of my unfamiliar code. That's 100% understandable, I would
probably do the same. It was only the lack of comment that bothered me.

> I will have a look today. Could you point out precisely branch you want
> to merge currently ?

  For liblarch, I would like to roll ~khaeru/gtg/liblarch_migration into
~gtg-user/gtg/liblarch_migration. If you don't mind, I will merge them
manually, myself (preserving all the GUADEC additions) and push the
results into ~gtg-user. Please have a look at the resulting API (my
spreadsheet, attached again) and let's talk about if it needs more
public methods.

  For the new-date-class merge, if it's OK, please commit.

  For the code-layout-2 merge, people will have to look at my comments
vs. Bryce's on the merge, and see who is more convincing.

> I agree that diverging sucks but, so far, this is the price we have to
> pay for having to many brights coders on the same stuff. That liblarch
> development is a bit chaotic right now but we are seeing the light !

  Yup, I agree we are making good progress — with a little more
coordination, we can be more than the sum of our individual efforts.
That's all I hope for :)

-- 
Paul Kishimoto
SM candidate (2012), Technology & Policy Program
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

http://paul.kishimoto.name — +19053029315

Attachment: Liblarch API.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part