gtg-user team mailing list archive
-
gtg-user team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00068
Re: Why not docstrings?
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Lionel Dricot<ploum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Pitijo has started a branch to convert the codebase to docstring but I
> have no news from him.
>
> And yes, it should be done, ideally ;-)
>
Great news! :)
An alternative to doing one big branch is to ask that every one who
changes a function also changes the function to have a docstring
rather than a comment. This spreads the (often boring) work out and
reduces the chances of major conflicts.
But one big branch can work just fine too.
Thanks for the quick reply,
jml
References