gwibber-bugs team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 606371] Re: Gwibber is fine, but code should have more comments/docstrings.

To: gwibber-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Sam L." <606371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:05:32 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 606371 <606371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

** Changed in: gwibber
       Status: New => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gwibber
Bug Heros, which is subscribed to Gwibber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606371

Title:
  Gwibber is fine, but code should have more comments/docstrings.

Status in Gwibber:
  Opinion

Bug description:
   Actually, gwibber (I use branch version) works pretty well, but the
  problem is that the code isn't well commented/documented...

   It makes helping fixing bugs or implementing blueprints harder for
  external developers.

   It would really help if the code was commented and this would add new
  contributors to the code.

  [ Look at nearly all files, they havn't any comment :/ ]