gwibber-team team mailing list archive

[Greg Grossmeier <greg.grossmeier@xxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, no (to my understanding).

The reason why translations are required to be BSD is so that they can
be relicensed as part of the overall project.

See the copyright notice on all the .po files:
"# This file is distributed under the same license as the gwibber package."

So the translations are effectively dual licensed BSD and GPL.

greg

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Miia Ranta <myrtti+gwibber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2009/2/17 Greg Grossmeier <greg.grossmeier@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I talked with Sebastien just now on IRC.
>>
>> The LGPL thing is in the packaging (debian/copyright) and was changed
>> by fta just now.
>>
>> I'm not sure what seb is seeing for the BSD sources.  I grep'd for BSD
>> and all I could find was the reference to the Spaz twitter client in
>> the Funkatron README.  It just says that Spaz is licensed under a BSD
>> license, not that we used any of Spaz's code.
>>
>
> What about translations?
> https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/LicensingFAQ
>
> Miia "Myrtti" Ranta
> --
> GCS/ED/FA/H/P/S/L/O d- s:+ a28 C++ UL+ P+ L+++ E W+++ N+ o K+ w+(---)
> !O M?>+ V? PS++>$ PE>$ Y+ PGP- t+ 5+++ X+ R tv- b+++ DI++++ D-- G
> e>+++ h- r x+
>