instant team mailing list archive

[kent-and@xxxxxxxxx]

> 2008/9/2 Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 10:27:18PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>>> 2008/9/2  <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> I'll fix the numarray/Numeric code although I
>>> >> guess nobody uses it.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Both Numeric and numarray work on my machine, but the test examples
>>> used the
>>> > same cache_dir and this caused trouble.
>>> >
>>> > Kent
>>>
>>> Then the bug is really in the cache mechanism: we must add more
>>> stuff to the cache_md5sum. If cache_dir isn't provided manually,
>>> the default instant cache dir should always work transparently.
>>
>> Should we use SHA-1 instead of MD5? It would be enough to use the
>> first 10 characters of the SHA-1 hash (which is what Mercurial uses
>> for changesets I think) or we could do all 40.
>>
>> --
>> Anders
>
> Ok.

Fine by me, what is good with SHA-1 ?

Kent