kaliveda-dev team mailing list archive

[John Frankland <1346328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

il paraît qu'il y a un bug dans la cohérence Si-CsI
dans le cas où l'id CsI dit 'au-dessus de la ligne fragment', comment peut-on finir avec
une identification Si-CsI Z=1?

** Affects: kaliveda
     Importance: High
     Assignee: John Frankland (frankland)
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: kaliveda/1.9
     Importance: High
     Assignee: John Frankland (frankland)
         Status: Triaged

** Also affects: kaliveda/1.9
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: kaliveda/1.9
    Milestone: None => 1.9.3

** Changed in: kaliveda/1.9
     Assignee: (unassigned) => John Frankland (frankland)

** Changed in: kaliveda/1.9
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: kaliveda/1.9
       Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of KaliVeda
Development Team, which is subscribed to KaliVeda.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346328

Title:
  coherency CsI/Si-Csi - CsI=>IMF, Si-CsI=>Z=1, on prend Z=1??

Status in KaliVeda data analysis framework:
  Triaged
Status in KaliVeda 1.9 series:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  il paraît qu'il y a un bug dans la cohérence Si-CsI
  dans le cas où l'id CsI dit 'au-dessus de la ligne fragment', comment peut-on finir avec
  une identification Si-CsI Z=1?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kaliveda/+bug/1346328/+subscriptions