kernel-packages team mailing list archive
-
kernel-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08502
[Bug 1214462] [NEW] Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
Public bug reported:
Dear Developers and maintainers,
trying not to make a big fuzz about it:
Let me just quote
https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from
2012-06-05:
> The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely
following the 12.04 release.
Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow
naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel.
Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log:
linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low
* Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10
* Temporarily disable LBM
* Remove non-PAE i386 references
-- mail adress hidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700
Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if
appropriate
Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the
index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug
has security-potential.
Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day.
** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: precise quantal raring saucy
** Description changed:
Dear Developers and maintainers,
trying not to make a big fuzz about it:
Let me just quote
https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from
2012-06-05:
> The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely
following the 12.04 release.
Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow
naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel.
- Trying to find appropiate inormation in the package change-log:
+ Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log:
linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low
- * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10
- * Temporarily disable LBM
- * Remove non-PAE i386 references
+ * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10
+ * Temporarily disable LBM
+ * Remove non-PAE i386 references
- -- mail adress hidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700
+ -- mail adress hidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700
Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if
appropriate
Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the
index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug
has security-potential.
Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214462
Title:
Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1
_ Linus would not smile _.
Status in “linux-meta” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Dear Developers and maintainers,
trying not to make a big fuzz about it:
Let me just quote
https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from
2012-06-05:
> The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely
following the 12.04 release.
Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow
naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel.
Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log:
linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low
* Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10
* Temporarily disable LBM
* Remove non-PAE i386 references
-- mail adress hidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700
Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if
appropriate
Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the
index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug
has security-potential.
Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1214462/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Christopher M. Penalver, 2013-08-23
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-21
-
[Bug 1214462] Missing required logs.
From: Brad Figg, 2013-08-21
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-21
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-20
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-20
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Joseph Salisbury, 2013-08-20
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-20
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Brad Figg, 2013-08-20
-
[Bug 1214462] Re: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-20
-
[Bug 1214462] [NEW] Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _.
From: Flames_in_Paradise, 2013-08-20
References