kernel-packages team mailing list archive

[Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

We have inconsistant settings for CONFIG_NO_HZ_* and as part of that we
have moved to a consistent CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE (bug #1413968).  We wish to
evaluate the overhead of CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL as part of determining if we
should move to this being on across the board.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Low
     Assignee: Colin Ian King (colin-king)
         Status: Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
    Milestone: None => ubuntu-15.02

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413969

Title:
  evaluate the utility and overhead of CONFIG_ NO_HZ_FULL

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  We have inconsistant settings for CONFIG_NO_HZ_* and as part of that
  we have moved to a consistent CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE (bug #1413968).  We
  wish to evaluate the overhead of CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL as part of
  determining if we should move to this being on across the board.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1413969/+subscriptions