kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Subversion Changes
> 1) The November release candidate has been copied into
> Notice that the day of month has been dropped and we are using 'Nov'
> instead of 11.
Who is this "we"? ;-)
Such enumeration of versions is undesirable for example in my Gentoo Linux.
It is impossible to correctly compare such versions at package upgrade.
The examples of good version numbering:
1.4-r2 (2 - is a release of package)
200711-r468 (468 - is a SVN revision)
20071122-r468 (468 - is a SVN revision)
Can we come to the consensus with KiCad versioning?
My propositions of numbering:
or maybe 2.0
P.S. This is not a criticism, but a requirement for some compatibility.