kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01531
Re: Interested new developer
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
kajdas <kajdas@...>
-
Date:
Wed, 7 May 2008 13:40:29 -0700
-
In-reply-to:
<486711.69657.qm@...>
-
Sensitivity:
Normal
Coding looks OK, the only issue I have is the way the functions and variables are named.
Don't we have some kind of KiCad standard naming convention?
I am used to Hungarian notation from Microsoft that a lot of linux programs follow.
Martin
---- c w <panhandler13@...> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Attached is a diff file for the dialog_build_BOM.cpp
> in the eeschema directory. It fixes the BOM order so
> that C2 gets listed before C101. It also takes into
> consideration fractured symbols like U1A and U10A.
> Let me know what you think.
Follow ups
References