kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02453
Re: [PATCH] enable-parallel-make.patch
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"jean-pierre.charras@..." <jean-pierre.charras@...>
-
Date:
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:18 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<20090429162551.GC31895@...>
-
User-agent:
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
Werner Almesberger a écrit :
>
>
> Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> > Perhaps Jean-Pierre uses them, so I think they should be renamed to
> > Jean-Pierre. make
>
> Hehe :-) Okay, let's see what Jean-Pierre thinks about it.
>
First, the "official" way to compile kicad is using cmake and cmakefiles
I am using them.
I also am using makefile for "fast" compilation:
because "my makefiles" do not handle dependencies, when changing a file
header, running make is faster than using cmake and the autogenerated
makefiles,
and i use in to test the syntax of my changes (my new files...).
Of course the build is not reliable (just because the makefiles have not
dependencies), and the reliable build is made with cmake.
So, in order to avoid mistakes, i am thinking the best is to remove
"my" makefile.xxx
If nobody complains about this, I'll remove them in few days.
--
Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
Maître de conférences
Directeur d'études 2ieme année.
Génie Electrique et Informatique Industrielle 2
Institut Universitaire de Technologie 1 de Grenoble
BP 67, 38402 St Martin d'Heres Cedex
Recherche :
GIPSA-LIS - INPG
Rue de la Houille Blanche
38400 Saint Martin d'Heres
--------------020003000203070802060407 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Werner Almesberger a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:20090429162551.GC31895@..."
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<div>
<div>
<div> <br>
<br>
<p>Dick Hollenbeck wrote:<br>
> Perhaps Jean-Pierre uses them, so I think they should be renamed
to <br>
> Jean-Pierre. make<br>
<br>
Hehe :-) Okay, let's see what Jean-Pierre thinks about it.<br>
<br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
First, the "official" way to compile kicad is using cmake and cmakefiles<br>
I am using them.<br>
<br>
I also am using makefile for "fast" compilation:<br>
because "my makefiles" do not handle dependencies, when changing a file
header, running make is faster than using cmake and the autogenerated
makefiles,<br>
and i use in to test the syntax of my changes (my new files...).<br>
Of course the build is not reliable (just because the makefiles have
not dependencies), and the reliable build is made with cmake.<br>
<br>
So, in order to avoid mistakes, i am thinking the best is to remove
"my" makefile.xxx<br>
<br>
If nobody complains about this, I'll remove them in few days.<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
Maître de conférences
Directeur d'études 2ieme année.
Génie Electrique et Informatique Industrielle 2
Institut Universitaire de Technologie 1 de Grenoble
BP 67, 38402 St Martin d'Heres Cedex
Recherche :
GIPSA-LIS - INPG
Rue de la Houille Blanche
38400 Saint Martin d'Heres
</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------020003000203070802060407--
Follow ups
References
