kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02685
Re: Layers visibility
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Brian Sidebotham <brian.sidebotham@...>
-
Date:
Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:38:06 +0100
-
In-reply-to:
<4A2DABAE.60501@...>
2009/6/9 Dick Hollenbeck <dick@...>:
>
>> Secondly, I would like to reinforce my thought that this dialog should
>> not just be thought of in terms of layer properties, but also other
>> object properties in the future too. It would seem much nicer to
>> select an object, say a via or a track or drawing and go to an "Object
>> Properties" tab on this dialog where one can edit the object
>> properties, say drill size, width, etc.
>>
>
> This does not work for me. I would like to call Gabriele's mock up, a
> layer toolbox.
>
> We were not talking about "this dialog".
>
> You are indeed straying off topic.
>
> If we confuse the issue enough, then nothing will get done.
>
> I'd like to call it a "layer toolbox". If you want to dock it, then we
> can eventually put it into wxAUI. Never, seen a layer toolbox before?
> Good. That gives Gabriele license to use a tab if he wants. Because
> he will be the first to ever develop one. The most common concern
> before, during brainstorming, was about screen real-estate. So let's
> not now be criticial of the concept of conserving screen real-estate,
> or a tab, whose purpose it is to preserve screen real-estate.
>
> My original suggestion was a layer toolbox from which you can pull up a
> 2nd, layer specific dialog window. So your posting, which refers to
> "this dialog" is ambiguous at best.
It sounds like things have moved on then and some things have already
been decided. i.e. there will now be a toolbox and a more complex
dialog for editing layer information. I missed where this was decided
upon, I probably dozed off whilst trying to catch up with the thread.
>
>> I'm sorry if this seems to start straying off-subject. There is of
>> course no reason why these features can't be added in the future.
>
> True, and that will be the easiest path, and to do so on a different
> thread after the layer stuff is done.
I'll be quiet then...
Best Regards,
Brian.
Follow ups
References