kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Dick Hollenbeck <dick@...>
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:14:34 -0500
Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (X11/20090608)
I am astonished, and disappointed, that you would begin coding "net
classes" without any discussion, considering that I had stated an
intention to code this myself in this posting:
My problem with your action is the lack of respect for my stated desire
to contribute this design and capability. Although one can argue that
we should operate on a "first to code, first to implement," free for
all, I find the *lack of discussion* about your start astonishing. This
is in view of my effective "reservation" of the contribution.
You apparently don't feel that I have the right to reserve the
implementation or design of this feature. But if that is the case, then
that should have been expressed by you before you began coding it.
So unless you simply missed my posting, I ask you kindly for an
The issue here is not whether we need the capability. We do. And I am
happy to get the capability. But there were any number of things that
you could have started, including UNDO support.
My actual complaint here is the lack of discussion, and disregard for my