kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04558
Re: Patch to support FreeRouting for PCBs without through-plating
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"Henry" <hvontres@...>
-
Date:
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:36:02 -0000
-
In-reply-to:
<20100315155511.GG21701@...>
-
User-agent:
eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Håvard Espeland <gus@...> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:55:19AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> (...)
> >
> > 1) If there was a single boolean in the export UI (checkbox) to control
> > the nature of the export in this regard, do you still need component
> > specific control over whether this technique is used on specific
> > components? i.e. would it be acceptable to treat all through hole
> > components this way when the boolean is set?
> >
>
> It is not strictly necessary to have individual component control, but
> it certainly is advantagous. DIL-chips and capacitors for instance are
> easy to solder on both sides which saves a lot of vias. Pin arrays, on
> the other hand, are not, and I think it also depends on how much effort
> you are willing to put into soldering them.
>
> > 2) Have you tested the idea of putting a keepout under the component,
> > but not modifying the padstacks? How does freerouter respond this this?
>
> Good question. I tested it now, and FreeRouting behaves correctly,
> thus it is not necessary to modify the padstacks to connect only on one
> side.
>
> --
> Håvard Espeland
>
I have used keepouts for this purpose before. Would it be possible to have board and/or module level keepouts defined in kicad?
Follow ups
References