kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05877
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
Dick,
The main point in my reply earlier was just that the visual results
are not equivalent. However, I agree with you that using OR is the way
to go if it is acceptable that things in gerbview will look a little
different than before. At least I'm ok with that.
Anyways, I think that the graphics we are talking about here is not
very complex and should be doable. Someone mentioned wxGraphicsContext
in the mailing list a while ago and that it should bring a performance
boost. When working on the patch I briefly experimented with wxGCDC
(which I think wraps wxGraphicsContext in a wxDC compatible way?).
However, the performance was pretty bad and since it turned out that
alpha blending was not necessary I didn't continue on that route any
further.
marco
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for your patience.
>
> Your code is technically correct, but it has severe performance problems on my
> system. I have the fastest computer of anybody that I personally know. 64 bit
> machine, very high end graphics card.
>
>
> Taking from a comment I added to my portion of the Draw function this AM:
>
> // On Linux with a large screen, this version is much faster and without flicker,
> // but gives a PCBNEW look where layer colors blend together. Plus it works
> // only because the background color is black. But it may be more useable for some.
> // The difference is due in part because of the cpu cycles needed to create the
> // monochromatic bitmap above, and the extra time needed to do bit indexing
> // into the monochromatic bitmap on the blit above.
>
> The cost of testing the individual monocromatic bit for each device context bit is
> proportional to X * Y of the screen, so with "O squared" on screen area. I have a
> very large screen. And I am having problems with drawing only two layers, not 10
> which will be even worse.
>
>
> If we cannot find a faster way to get your desired behaviour, I think we we will have
> to support it in a toggle mode. So I am happy to spend some more time searching for
> an optimal solution with you if you do not mind.
>
> How do you feel about the toggle button? Both modes have some advantages from a user
> experience perspective. My code is obviously dependent on the background being black,
> and that may not always be the case in the future, so I have put a comment in to that
> effect.
>
> I do not think we are done yet.
>
> Dick
Follow ups
References
-
[PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Marco Mattila, 2010-12-06
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-06
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-06
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Marco Mattila, 2010-12-07
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-07
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Marco Mattila, 2010-12-09
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-12
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Marco Mattila, 2010-12-12
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: jean-pierre charras, 2010-12-12
-
Re: [PATCH] Option to subtract soldermask from silkscreen in gerber output
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-12