kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06952
Re: Kicad future documentation - first draft
-
To:
kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:39:39 -0500
-
In-reply-to:
<1317072815.14803.55.camel@keruseykaryu-VirtualBox>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Thunderbird/3.1.13
On 09/26/2011 04:33 PM, Kerusey Karyu wrote:
> Dnia 2011-09-26, pon o godzinie 17:14 +0200, fabrizio pisze:
>> Dear All,
>> I seem to understand that the use of the .odt (and pdf) format and
>> LibreOffice as main editor is the choice preferred by most of the
>> people.
>>
> LibreOffice or OpenOffice. No matter.
>
>> In attachment you can find the document kicad_en.pdf modified and
>> updated. The following modifications where made:
>> - front cover was redesigned (any suggestions for improvement?)
>>
> This KiCad main icon is ugly. :( This form is good for documents, but
> not for the whole application. Anyway, compare it yourself with the rest
> of icons of the KiCad Suite members. Clearly does not fit. BTW: Why
> CvPCB icon has a blue base?
> The text is ok, but what the Cannonical says...
>
>> - A quite cool template (taken from the official open office
>> documentation) was used to restyle the whole doc.
>> - New icons and screenshots (all included as local links)
>> - some minor corrections
>>
> IMHO the new KiCad documentation should be a big-bang for the future
> readers. In general.
> Your layout is too "polite". Especially with these smoothing green
> headers. The Arial font or his equivalent - it already was.
> Lack of emphasis for important key words, no monotype in file paths or
> names - the fundamental elements of IT manuals are missing.
> Sorry. But I do not like it.
this != constructive criticism.
volunteers cannot be addressed in this way.
> Kerusey Karyu
Follow ups
References