← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?

 

Thank you Heiko.
Sorry for my broken english.
Heiko understood what I mean.

I add. For example:
I have OPAMP. I use 2 symbols OPAMP2 (2 in body), OPAMP4 and I use 3 footprints. I make 6 components (6 files only with different pin assignment). And if I'll be want to add new
opamps I only add components files.
You should have 6 different symbols (a different only with pins assignment). If you want to add
new opamps you should be add new symbols (copy old symbols, rename pins).

Thanabstractioncloser to the real objectthen the easier it isto operate.
Symbol and footprint are only abstractions. Component is it more closer to real object. Need to try operate with real objects (object oriented developing). Simple users are like that,
because it is more simple for them.



09.06.2015 00:28, Heiko Rosemann пишет:
Yes, it is for Eagle (although components, footprints and symbols were all saved in the same file when I last used Eagle, but still during the schematic and PCB design phase you only interact with components) and I guess that's what Eldar tried to achieve too.

 * Английский - определен
 * Английский
 * Русский

 * Английский
 * Русский

<javascript:void(0);><#>
для них

References