kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #24644
Re: Maximum undo items
I'm going to document the one developer setting for now; we can discuss later
whether we should go back and add all the settings to the developer
documentation. I think it'd be nice to have them documented, personally.
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:50:29AM +1200, Simon Wells wrote:
> I would prefer to see general documentation regarding all the settings
> possible in the file.... with maybe notes saying "This option is not
> accessible in the gui but can be set manually in the file"
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:20 PM, jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Le 12/05/2016 à 01:22, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> >> While we're discussing making an option config-file-only, do we have a
> >> preferred place in developer documentation to list these sorts of things?
> >
> > Perhaps a file like <src>/Documentation/developers_notes.txt ?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:50:10PM +0200, jp charras wrote:
> >>> Le 11/05/2016 à 14:32, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> >>>> At a minimum I would leave the config file entry and the code to access
> >>>> the config entries in place so you could manually modify the config file
> >>>> for debugging purposes. @JP, would that be acceptable to you? I agree
> >>>> that we should not expose debugging settings in the UI but I also
> >>>> understand the need for development settings without having to create a
> >>>> special build just to debug a specific section of code.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, this is acceptable.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/10/2016 3:31 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> >>>>> Actually, you might be onto something. Of course you can FRO with the
> >>>>> environment vars ;D but perhaps we could leave it an option to be set in the
> >>>>> configuration manually for the one time in 2018 JP wants to restrict this for
> >>>>> debugging...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:58:58AM +1200, Simon Wells wrote:
> >>>>>> or just make it so it always works but is either a command line
> >>>>>> option/env variable or manually editing the configuration file
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Chris Pavlina <pavlina.chris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Urgh, do we really need to keep features that a developer may need at some
> >>>>>>> point in the future in the UI? This is something that one person may need once
> >>>>>>> sometime next year. Can't we make this a #define or something instead?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We really shouldn't be cluttering everyone's UI with developer-only options.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:54:05PM +0200, jp charras wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 10/05/2016 à 20:41, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>> Back in August (git:aaadb40), I made the undo history infinite in pcbnew,
> >>>>>>>>> eeschema, modedit, and libedit. Wayne wanted this to remain an option, in case
> >>>>>>>>> of issues with the memory consumption of the undo stack. Currently, if you set
> >>>>>>>>> "Maximum undo items" to zero, you get infinite history. I also made it default
> >>>>>>>>> to unlimited.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In the seven months since I did that, has anybody ever needed to limit that?
> >>>>>>>>> I've found the memory consumption caused by it to be quite minimal even on very
> >>>>>>>>> long layout sessions (I do not often shut my computer down other than to
> >>>>>>>>> install kernel updates and do not generally close things I'm working on, so
> >>>>>>>>> pcbnew can remain open for weeks at a time...).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And if nobody has needed to change the limit, can I remove it to reduce options
> >>>>>>>>> clutter?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please, do not remove it.
> >>>>>>>> For most of users, this option is not useful.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> However, developers need to be able to set the value (usually at a low value like 2 or 3) when the
> >>>>>>>> undo/redo has an issue (usually related to object deletion), even in release mode.
> >>>>>>>> Sometimes a crash can happen when objects in undo/redo list are deleted, if there is a bug in these
> >>>>>>>> functions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References
-
Maximum undo items
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-05-10
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: jp charras, 2016-05-10
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-05-10
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: Simon Wells, 2016-05-10
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-05-10
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-05-11
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: jp charras, 2016-05-11
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-05-11
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: jp charras, 2016-05-12
-
Re: Maximum undo items
From: Simon Wells, 2016-05-12