kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/19/2017 4:27 AM, John Beard wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Nox <noxfiregalaxy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What about wxFFileInputStream instead of wxFileInputStream?
>>
> 
> wxFFileInputStream appears to be about 5-6 times faster than
> wxFileInputStream, but that's still much much slower than RICHIO or
> std::ifstream.
> 
> $ qa/io_benchmark/io_benchmark /tmp/all.lib 2
> IO Bench Mark Util
>   Benchmark file: /tmp/all.lib
>   Repetitions:    2
> std::fstream              317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 16 ms
> std::fstream, reused      317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 16 ms
> RICHIO                    317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 91 ms
> RICHIO, reused            317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 90 ms
> New fstream IO            317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 19 ms
> New fstream IO, reused    317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 19 ms
> wxIStream                 317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 3558 ms
> wxIStream, reused         317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 3429 ms
> wxFFIStream               317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 589 ms
> wxFFIStream, reused       317858 lines, acc: 25103384 in 602 ms
> 

John,

Did you create a patch for your wxInputStream benchmarking code?  I
would like to merge this.  I think it would be a useful tool for developers.

Thanks,

wayne