kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: [PATCH] LIB_PART coherency
Keep in mind that the symbol does not know which library it is in. That
is determined when the library is parsed in SYMBOL_LIB_TABLE. As long
as you don't break that, I cannot think of a reason not to unify the
symbol name but then again there are some quirks in the schematic code
that still jump up an bite me from time to time.
On 11/12/2017 06:00 PM, Maciej Suminski wrote:
> I think this is a question to Wayne, but if others have any idea what
> may go wrong, do not hesitate to reply.
> I have noticed that part name and library values are duplicated in a few
> places in LIB_PART class and it is possible to set them individually. It
> means there is a way to set each of them to a different value,
> potentially causing more problems.
> With the attached patches, there is only one method to set all fields to
> the same value. It is called in all places where the fields were
> modified directly.
> My main concern is related to LIB_ID: are there any cases where the
> LIB_ID name/library fields should be different than what is stored in
> the LIB_PART fields?
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp