kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #32151
Re: COMPONENT_TREE performance
-
To:
Chris Pavlina <pavlina.chris@xxxxxxxxx>, <kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 4 Dec 2017 18:53:12 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.50) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
In-reply-to:
<20171204174828.ufp2rs42pszjhnst@radish.local>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
On 04/12/17 18:48, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Hey, just a comment because I see people are wrestling with
> COMPONENT_TREE performance as I did when writing it. TEST ON MACOS. The
> performance of the widget there has a really different profile from on
> other systems. I had to do things in really unobvious ways to make it
> perform reasonably there.
>
I've noticed spending more and more time fixing wxWidgets bugs instead
of Kicad bugs. Maybe we should have a serious look at Qt or Electron
(Webkit/JS-based UI) as a possible future alternative for wx...
Tom (fighting with wxWidgets thread safety under Windows...)
Follow ups
References
