kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #39100
Re: [RFC/PATCH] Generic utility tool
-
To:
kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:58:20 -0500
-
In-reply-to:
<CAG1r56J9N6NKGF=sKQem=iO8pEFUxE+urJbB2LGFF8DffNBMDg@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
John,
The original patch no longer applies cleanly. It looks useful so I
don't see any reason not to merge it.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 1/19/2019 9:30 AM, John Beard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A very gentle bump here. I'm thinking about a utility to assist in
> debugging/benchmarking/testing/developing DRC routines (currently
> working on some DRC unit testing, but the testing utils are easily
> re-used into a small utility-style executable).
>
> However, I am cognisant of the costs of adding things like this,
> especially with such large link times and RAM usage of things that
> suck in the pcbnew object library. So I'd like to know if:
>
> 1) These kinds of utilities are wanted at all, or are they adding
> maintenance overhead for tools no-one ever uses? I'd understand that
> perspective, as I appreciate developer time is highly limited and
> cross-platform breakage is so easy to perpetrate.
> 2) If wanted, is a "merged" approach appreciated, or keep them
> separate, in the hopes of once day having shared libs and much reduced
> link time/effort?
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References