← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Windows builds broken

 

I don't think so, at least when I look at the PKGBUILD it is still
using bootstrap.sh and b2 to build. See:
https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/fd550b8d48e6bc831b1e36202eaf495cba5062f8/mingw-w64-boost/PKGBUILD

I don't see anything immediately alarming. Maybe the builds scripts in
boost changed such that they need patching to work properly with
msys2?

Also it seems that other people are struggling:
https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/5233

Nick

On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 15:41, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/1/2019 8:53 AM, John Beard wrote:
> > On 01/05/2019 13:36, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >> On 5/1/2019 8:27 AM, John Beard wrote:
> >>> On 01/05/2019 12:53, Jeff Young wrote:
> >>>> Someone on the forums had to turn off the qa tests on Linux to get it
> >>>> to build:
> >> It fails during linking not compiling.  I also tried clang but I get the
> >> same error.  Here is the gcc command that is failing:
> >
> > Jeff's forum issue is a compiler failure in qa_kicad2step, not linking
> > in qa_sexpr. I don't think it's related to this.
> >
> >> cd /E/build/mingw64/kicad/product-debug/qa/libs/sexpr &&
> >> /E/msys64/mingw64/bin/g++.exe -Wall  -Wsuggest-override -Werror=vla
> >> -fpermissive -g3 -ggdb3 -DDEBUG -Wno-deprecated-declarations
> >> -Wl,--whole-archive CMakeFiles/qa_sexpr.dir/objects.a
> >> -Wl,--no-whole-archive  -o qa_sexpr.exe
> >> -Wl,--major-image-version,0,--minor-image-version,0
> >> ../../../libs/sexpr/libsexpr.a
> >> ../../unit_test_utils/libunit_test_utils.a -LE:/msys64/mingw64/lib -pipe
> >> -Wl,--subsystem,windows -mwindows -lwx_mswu_gl-3.0 -lwx_mswu_aui-3.0
> >> -lwx_mswu_adv-3.0 -lwx_mswu_html-3.0 -lwx_mswu_core-3.0
> >> -lwx_baseu_net-3.0 -lwx_baseu-3.0 -lwx_baseu_xml-3.0 -lwx_mswu_stc-3.0
> >> -lkernel32 -luser32 -lgdi32 -lwinspool -lshell32 -lole32 -loleaut32
> >> -luuid -lcomdlg32 -ladvapi32
> >
> > Do *any* unit tests build? I don't see "-lboost_unit_test_framework
> > -lboost_filesystem -lboost_system" in there, and it should be. Does
> > CMake have the right paths? For me, it is like this:
> >
> >
> > Boost_UNIT_TEST_FRAMEWORK_LIBRARY_DEBUG:FILEPATH=/usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so
>
> boost_unit_test_framework_DIR:PATH=E:/msys64/mingw32/lib/cmake/boost_unit_test_framework-1.70.0
>
> Looks like msys2 folks decided to use boost's cmake support to build
> boost starting with 1.70 instead of the old boost build system.  I
> thought this was still experimental but I could be wrong.  None the
> less, boost 1.70 is broken on msys2 so I guess I will have to downgrade
> and pin boost yet again :(  For everyone out there using msys2, do not
> upgrade to boost 1.70.  If you did, downgrade boost to 1.69 and edit
> your pacman.conf file to prevent boost from upgrading.
>
> >
> >
> > Sadly Arch hasn't got Boost 1.70 yet, so it's a bit tricky to test.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Follow ups

References