kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #40482
Re: In response to KiCon panel question "atomic" vs "CvPcb" answer
-
To:
kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Rene Pöschl <poeschlr@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 3 May 2019 22:59:49 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<CAP0gFe8Nxj3GZ5-yr3wLxvefkJZ8m+=n_WiCa0_Z1cOANKS4Hg@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
On 03/05/19 22:48, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
I was just trying to find this discussion in the video, can you give
the time?
The link to the video is here, for the future generations of internet
search engine users who find this thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRwTyBX2BFk
Around 4 minutes in.
And i think a single remark made towards the end of that answer spawned
this hellfire:
https://forum.kicad.info/t/more-fully-specified-symbol-library-discussion/16701
(Fair warning the poster took a small remark way too seriously and
assumed that the fully specified symbol workflow might go away. Which i
do not belive was the intended message at all. The reason i even made
this post was that i knew that thread quite well and immediately
realized where the user got the ideas from just by hearing that answer.
I just wanted to give you guys my interpretation of the 2 or 3 possible
workflows as a possible reference and in part to ensure users that all
workflows are seen as equally viable depending on exact circumstance.)
Follow ups
References